Kommentar: Warum wir immer noch MS Teams kaufen, obwohl wir Nextcloud haben

European businesses and public administrations are increasingly facing a dilemma regarding digital sovereignty, with readily available open-source alternatives like Nextcloud often overlooked in favor of established US-based solutions. This persistent reliance on foreign platforms, despite the existence of robust European offerings, highlights a significant gap between the aspiration for digital independence and the practical decision-making processes within organizations. The core issue revolves around a perceived lack of courage among decision-makers to fully embrace and implement these sovereign technologies. While platforms such as Nextcloud offer significant advantages in terms of data control and customization, aligning with the EU's digital sovereignty goals, many entities continue to procure services like Microsoft Teams. This trend suggests that factors beyond technical capability and policy alignment, such as inertia, perceived ease of integration, or established vendor relationships, are heavily influencing procurement choices. The economic implications are substantial, potentially limiting the growth of the European tech sector and reinforcing dependency on non-European digital infrastructure. The impact of this continued reliance on foreign software extends beyond mere economic considerations, touching upon data security and regulatory compliance. By not fully leveraging European alternatives, organizations may inadvertently expose sensitive data to jurisdictions with differing privacy standards, complicating adherence to regulations like GDPR. The broader implication is a missed opportunity to foster a more resilient and independent European digital ecosystem, capable of competing on a global stage.